You need to know: Euclidean space , surface in
, surface area, neighbourhood of a point in the surface, boundary, path, endpoints of a path, surface with and without self-intersections, compact subset of
, compact subset of a surface.
Background: A surface is called a minimal surface if every point
has a neighbourhood S, with boundary B, such that S has a minimal area out of all surfaces S’ with the same boundary B. A surface
is called simply connected if for every 2 points
and
there is a path in M with endpoints x and y, and every 2 such paths can be continuously transformed into each other within M while keeping both endpoints x and y fixed. A surface
is called properly embedded in
, if it has no boundary, no self-intersections, and its intersection with any compact subset of
is compact. A helicoid is the surface defined by equations
where
is a constant, and
are real parameters, ranging from
to
.
The Theorem: On 13th March 2001, William Meeks III and Harold Rosenberg submitted to Annals of Mathematics a paper in which they proved that any properly embedded simply connected minimal surface in is either a plane or a helicoid.
Short context: Minimal surfaces, ones that locally minimises their areas, are among the most studied objects in geometry and topology. A trivial example of minimal surface is the plane. One of the simplest non-trivial examples, described by Euler in 1774, is a helicoid. Since 1774, many other minimal surfaces has been discovered, but none of them are properly embedded and simply connected. The Theorem proves that in fact there are no other minimal surfaces with these natural properties.
Links: The original paper is available here. See also Section 5.3 of this book for an accessible description of the Theorem.
4 thoughts on “A properly embedded simply connected minimal surface in R^3 is either a plane or a helicoid”