The sequence of perfect squares is L1-universally bad

You need to know: Probability space X with measure \mu and set of measurable subsets {\cal X}, the notion of “almost all” x\in X, notation T^n(x) for n-fold composiition T(T(\dots T(x))\dots) of map T: X \to X, notation T^{-1}(A):=\{x \in X\,|\, T(x) \in A\} for the preimage of A \subset X, integration on X, notation L^p(X) for set of functions f:X \to {\mathbb R} such that \int_X|f(x)|^pd\mu < \infty, notation \{n_k\}_{k=1}^\infty for sequence n_1, n_2, \dots, n_k, \dots.

Background: An ergodic dynamical system (X,T) is a probability space X, together with map T: X \to X such that (i) \mu (T^{-1}(A)) = \mu(A) for all A \in {\cal X}, and (ii) for any A \in {\cal X} with T^{-1}(A)=A, either \mu(A)=0 or \mu(A)=1. A sequence \{n_k\}_{k=1}^\infty is called L1-universally bad if for all ergodic dynamical systems (X,T) there is some f \in L^1(X) and A \in {\cal X} with \mu(A)>0, such that the limit \lim\limits_{N\to\infty}\frac{1}{N}\sum\limits_{k=1}^N f(T^{n_k}(x)) fails to exist for all x\in A.

The Theorem: On 5th April 2005, Zoltán Buczolich and Daniel Mauldin submitted to arxiv and The Annals of Mathematics a paper in which they proved that the sequence \{k^2\}_{k=1}^\infty is L1-universally bad.

Short context: Famous Birkhoff’s Ergodic Theorem states that, for any ergodic dynamical system (X,T) and any f \in L^1(X) the limit \lim\limits_{N\to\infty}\frac{1}{N}\sum\limits_{k=1}^N f(T^k(x)) exists for almost all x\in X (in fact, this limit is equal to \int_X f(x) d\mu). An important research direction is to understand for which sequences \{n_k\}_{k=1}^\infty the corresponding limit \lim\limits_{N\to\infty}\frac{1}{N}\sum\limits_{k=1}^N f(T^{n_k}(x)) exists for almost all x\in X. In 1988, Bourgain proved this for sequence \{k^2\}_{k=1}^\infty, provided that f \in L^p(X) for some p>1, and asked if the same is true for all f \in L^1(X). The Theorem answers this question negatively.

Links: Free arxiv version of the original paper is here, journal version is here. See also Section 10.6 of this book for an accessible description of the Theorem.

Go to the list of all theorems

Leave a comment