You need to know: A (nontrivial) 3-term arithmetic progression, big O notation, small o notation.
Background: For integer , let
be the cardinality of the largest subset of
which contains no nontrivial 3-term arithmetic progressions.
The Theorem: On 30th October 2010, Tom Sanders submitted to arxiv a paper in which he proved that .
Short context: In 1936, Erdős and Turán conjectured that any set containing a positive proportion of integers must contain a 3-term arithmetic progression. This is equivalent to . In 1953, Roth confirmed this conjecture by proving that
. In 1999, Bourgain improved this to
. The Theorem proves a much stronger upper bound, the first one in the form
. In a later work, Bloom improved the bound slightly to
.
Links: Free arxiv version of the original paper is here, journal version is here.
4 thoughts on “The size of subset of {1,…,N} without 3-term arithmetic progressions is O(N/(log n)^(1-o(1)))”