The size of subset of {1,…,N} without 3-term arithmetic progressions is O(N/(log n)^(1-o(1)))

You need to know: A (nontrivial) 3-term arithmetic progression, big O notation, small o notation.

Background: For integer N>0, let r_3(N) be the cardinality of the largest subset of \{1, 2, \dots , N\} which contains no nontrivial 3-term arithmetic progressions.

The Theorem: On 30th October 2010, Tom Sanders submitted to arxiv a paper in which he proved that r_3(N) = O\left(\frac{N(\log\log N)^6}{\log N}\right).

Short context: In 1936, Erdős and Turán conjectured that any set containing a positive proportion of integers must contain a 3-term arithmetic progression. This is equivalent to \lim\limits_{N\to\infty}\frac{r_3(N)}{N}=0. In 1953, Roth confirmed this conjecture by proving that r_3(N) = O\left(\frac{N}{\log\log N}\right). In 1999, Bourgain improved this to r_3(N) = O\left(\frac{N\sqrt{\log\log N}}{\sqrt{\log N}}\right). The Theorem proves a much stronger upper bound, the first one in the form r_3(N) = O\left(\frac{N}{\log^{1-o(1)} N}\right). In a later work, Bloom improved the bound slightly to r_3(N) = O\left(\frac{N(\log\log N)^4}{\log N}\right).

Links: Free arxiv version of the original paper is here, journal version is here.

Go to the list of all theorems